The midsize truck segment has seen a resurgence in recent years, with consumers looking for a more efficient and versatile option compared to full-size trucks. Two popular contenders in this segment are the Ford Ranger and the GMC Canyon. Both trucks offer a combination of power, capability, and fuel efficiency, making them attractive choices for buyers. In this article, we will compare the Ford Ranger and the GMC Canyon in terms of their efficiency, examining factors such as fuel economy, engine options, and towing capacity. By the end, readers will have a comprehensive understanding of how these two trucks stack up against each other in terms of efficiency.
When it comes to fuel economy, the Ford Ranger and the GMC Canyon both offer competitive numbers. The Ford Ranger comes equipped with a 2.3-liter EcoBoost engine, which delivers an impressive EPA-estimated 21 mpg in the city and 26 mpg on the highway. On the other hand, the GMC Canyon offers a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine that achieves an EPA-estimated 20 mpg in the city and 26 mpg on the highway. While the difference in fuel economy may seem minimal, it can add up over time, especially for those who frequently drive long distances or use their trucks for work purposes.
It is important to note that fuel economy can vary depending on various factors such as driving conditions, payload, and towing. However, these EPA-estimated numbers provide a good baseline for comparison. Overall, both the Ford Ranger and the GMC Canyon offer respectable fuel efficiency for midsize trucks.
When it comes to engine options, the Ford Ranger and the GMC Canyon offer different choices to cater to different needs and preferences. The Ford Ranger comes standard with a 2.3-liter EcoBoost engine, which delivers a balance of power and efficiency. This turbocharged engine produces 270 horsepower and 310 lb-ft of torque, providing ample power for everyday driving and light towing.
On the other hand, the GMC Canyon offers three engine options. The base engine is a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine, which produces 200 horsepower and 191 lb-ft of torque. While this engine is sufficient for most daily driving needs, it may feel underpowered when towing or carrying heavy loads. The Canyon also offers a 3.6-liter V6 engine, which delivers 308 horsepower and 275 lb-ft of torque, providing more power for those who require it. Additionally, GMC offers a diesel engine option for the Canyon, which is a 2.8-liter four-cylinder turbocharged diesel engine. This engine produces 181 horsepower and an impressive 369 lb-ft of torque, making it ideal for those who prioritize towing capability and fuel efficiency.
Overall, the Ford Ranger offers a single engine option that strikes a good balance between power and efficiency, while the GMC Canyon provides more choices to cater to different needs and preferences.
For many truck buyers, towing capacity is a crucial factor to consider. The Ford Ranger and the GMC Canyon both offer respectable towing capabilities, but there are some differences to note. The Ford Ranger has a maximum towing capacity of 7,500 pounds when properly equipped. This makes it suitable for towing small to medium-sized trailers, boats, or recreational vehicles.
On the other hand, the GMC Canyon offers varying towing capacities depending on the engine choice. The base 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine has a maximum towing capacity of 3,500 pounds, while the 3.6-liter V6 engine can tow up to 7,000 pounds. However, the diesel engine option is where the GMC Canyon shines in terms of towing capacity. With the diesel engine, the Canyon can tow up to an impressive 7,700 pounds, surpassing the Ford Ranger in this aspect.
It is important to consider your specific towing needs when choosing between the Ford Ranger and the GMC Canyon. If you require maximum towing capacity, the GMC Canyon with the diesel engine option may be the better choice. However, if your towing needs are more modest, the Ford Ranger offers a capable option.
In addition to towing capacity, payload capacity is another important consideration for truck buyers. Payload capacity refers to the maximum weight that a truck can carry in its bed and cab. The Ford Ranger and the GMC Canyon offer competitive payload capacities, but there are some differences to note.
The Ford Ranger has a maximum payload capacity of 1,860 pounds, which is impressive for a midsize truck. This allows for carrying heavy loads in the bed or transporting passengers and cargo in the cab. On the other hand, the GMC Canyon has a slightly lower maximum payload capacity of 1,605 pounds with the base engine and 1,492 pounds with the diesel engine. While the difference may not be significant for most everyday needs, it is worth considering if you frequently carry heavy loads.
Ultimately, both the Ford Ranger and the GMC Canyon offer competitive payload capacities, but the Ford Ranger has a slight edge in this aspect.
Interior Space and Features
When it comes to interior space and features, the Ford Ranger and the GMC Canyon offer comfortable and well-equipped cabins. Both trucks can seat up to five passengers, with ample legroom and headroom in the front and rear seats. The Ford Ranger features a modern and user-friendly interior design, with high-quality materials and intuitive controls. The GMC Canyon also offers a well-designed interior, with a focus on comfort and convenience.
In terms of features, both trucks come equipped with a range of standard and available options. The Ford Ranger offers features such as an 8-inch touchscreen infotainment system, Apple CarPlay and Android Auto compatibility, and Ford’s Co-Pilot360 suite of advanced safety features. The GMC Canyon also offers similar features, including an 8-inch touchscreen infotainment system, smartphone integration, and available safety technologies.
It is worth noting that the GMC Canyon offers some additional features that may be appealing to buyers. These include an available Bose premium audio system, wireless charging, and a built-in Wi-Fi hotspot. However, it is important to consider whether these additional features are worth the potential higher cost.
In summary, the Ford Ranger and the GMC Canyon are both strong contenders in the midsize truck segment, offering a combination of power, capability, and efficiency. When it comes to fuel economy, the Ford Ranger has a slight edge with its 2.3-liter EcoBoost engine. However, the GMC Canyon offers more engine options, including a diesel engine that provides impressive towing capacity and fuel efficiency.
In terms of towing capacity, the GMC Canyon with the diesel engine option surpasses the Ford Ranger. However, if your towing needs are more modest, the Ford Ranger still offers a capable option. When it comes to payload capacity, the Ford Ranger has a slight edge over the GMC Canyon.
Both trucks offer comfortable and well-equipped interiors, with a range of features to enhance the driving experience. The GMC Canyon offers some additional features that may be appealing to buyers, but it is important to consider whether these features are worth the potential higher cost.
In conclusion, the choice between the Ford Ranger and the GMC Canyon ultimately depends on your specific needs and preferences. If fuel economy and payload capacity are your top priorities, the Ford Ranger may be the better choice. However, if towing capacity and a wider range of engine options are important to you, the GMC Canyon offers a compelling option. Ultimately, test driving both trucks and considering your specific needs will help you make an informed decision.